Feb. 27, 2015
Contact: Nardy Baeza Bickel, 734-763-0368, nbickel@umich.edu
Después de intensas discusiones en las últimas semanas, el Departamento de Educación de Puerto Rico publicó un documento que integraría las “perspectivas de género” en la educación pública.
El tema causó polémica en la isla, con detractores diciendo que el plan podría obligar a los niños a aprender acerca de la sexualidad en formas con las cual no están de acuerdo.
Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes, director del programa de Estudios de Latinas/Latinos de la Universidad de Michigan, ha estado siguiendo de cerca la discusión. Nacido y criado en Puerto Rico, La Fountain-Stokes es el autor de “Queer Ricans: Culturas y sexualidades en la Diáspora”, una colección de ensayos sobre la migración y la sexualidad.
La Fountain-Stokes será uno de varios profesores de la UM que participará en el simposio “La Negociación de Género, Raza y Etnia en una nueva Era Global,” a realizarse el próximo 6 y 7 de marzo. El evento, organizado por la UM y la Universidad de Puerto Rico, se llevará a cabo en Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto de Río Piedras. Al menos seis estudiantes de la UM y ex alumnos participarán como panelistas en el evento de dos días.
La conferencia es la primera de una serie de conferencias anuales que las universidades planean hacer como parte de una colaboración entre ambas instituciones.
La Fountain-Stokes discutió el tema con la UM Portal en Español:
Q: ¿Qué es la “perspectiva de género” y por qué debería enseñarse en las escuelas públicas?
La Fountain-Stokes: “Perspectiva de género” (análisis de género) es el estar consciente de las implicaciones sociales -a nivel individual y colectivo- del género. Específicamente, cómo el género de uno (el ser varón o hembra, hombre o mujer), afecta las experiencias de la persona en todos los niveles, incluso en contextos de violencia, desigualdad y discriminación. El análisis de género enfatiza múltiples dimensiones y variaciones de género, y puede incluir discusiones de la experiencia de transgénero. En Puerto Rico, la educación de perspectiva de género es especialmente necesaria dada la alta incidencia de la violencia contra las mujeres.
Q: La propuesta ha sido rechazada por grupos conservadores, así como varias instituciones religiosas, que han declarado que son los padres, no a las escuelas públicas, que deben educar a sus hijos en este tipo de cuestiones. ¿Cuál es su opinión?
La Fountain-Stokes: El género es un fenómeno social que afecta los derechos de los ciudadanos. Como tal, es la responsabilidad del estado promover el conocimiento y la educación al respecto. La discusión de género no se limita a los contextos religiosos. La separación de iglesia y estado garantiza el derecho a discutir asuntos importantes en un contexto público. Los padres tienen la libertad de educar a sus hijos en sus propios puntos de vista y tradiciones, pero no deben prohibir que los niños aprendan conceptos generales centrales para la política y la cultura en un estado democrático.
Q: ¿Cómo encaja esta iniciativa con lo que se enseña actualmente en las escuelas de los Estados Unidos (Puerto Rico es un territorio de EE.UU)?
La Fountain-Stokes: Las escuelas de Estados Unidos tienen una amplia gama de enfoques relativos a la enseñanza y práctica del análisis de género y algunos son más progresistas que otros. Los debates sobre estas cuestiones aparecen con frecuencia en la prensa, con respecto a asuntos tales como los clubes extracurriculares (Alianza de Apoyo a los Gay / Heterosexuales, etc), la discriminación contra los niños transexuales, etc.
Q: ¿Qué más ha afectado a la discusión de este tema en Puerto Rico?
La Fountain-Stokes: El ascenso de políticos afiliados a iglesias conservadoras (pentecostales y evangélicas) al poder en Puerto Rico ha distorsionado seriamente los debates públicos acerca de la moral y los derechos civiles. Estos políticos movilizan grandes grupos que no necesariamente comparten los puntos de vista mayoritarios pero sin embargo reciben enorme atención de los medios. Muchos de los partidos tradicionales también están dominados por los católicos muy conservadores, que en algunos casos tienen afiliaciones con organizaciones como el Opus Dei. En este contexto, es muy difícil conseguir que sea aprobada una legislación sobre el género y la sexualidad. A pesar de ello, las activistas feministas, miembros de la comunidad LGTB y legisladores simpatizantes trabajan muy duro para promover sus puntos de vista y las leyes progresistas.
Enlaces Relacionados
Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes
La Fountain-Stokes habla de su libro “Abolición del Pato” en Español.
Thursday, March 5, 2015
Gender perspectives in Puerto Rican childhood education
Feb 27, 2015 Contact Nardy Baeza Bickel, 734-763-0368, nbickel@umich.edu
FACULTY Q&A
En Español
For the last few weeks, Puerto Rico's streets have seen protesters for and against the incorporation of 'perspectivas de género' or gender perspectives in the public schools' curriculum.
Proponents say the curriculum would help promote gender equity and prevent domestic violence as well as gender stereotyping in the island where last year 12,000 cases of domestic violence were reported. Retractors fear the curriculum would force children to learn about homosexuality in ways they disagree with.
Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes, director of the Latina/o Studies Program at the University of Michigan, has been following the issue closely. Born and raised in Puerto Rico, La Fountain-Stokes authored "Queer Ricans: Cultures and Sexualities in the Diaspora," a collection of essays on migration and sexuality.
La Fountain-Stokes will be one of several U-M faculty participating in the "Negotiating Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in a New Global Age" symposium March 6-7. The event, organized by U-M and the Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto de Río Piedras will take place at UPR. At least six U-M students and alumni will participate as panelists in the two-day event, the first in a series of annual conferences the universities expect to collaborate on.
La Fountain-Stokes discussed the issue with U-M's Portal en Español:
Q: What's "gender perspective" and why are legislators trying to make it part of the curriculum?
La Fountain-Stokes: "Perspectiva de género" (gender analysis) is the awareness of the social implications of gender at the individual and collective level. Specifically, how one's gender (being male or female, a man or a woman) affects a person's experiences at all levels, including in contexts of violence, inequality and discrimination. Gender analysis emphasizes multiple dimensions and variations of gender, and can include discussions of transgender experience. In Puerto Rico, gender analysis education is particularly needed given the high incidence of violence against women. Gender perspective is not sex education. It is different and it is a fallacy to confuse the two. This issue has to do with discrimination on the basis of gender, not on teaching questions of reproduction.
Q: The proposal has been rejected by conservative groups, as well as religious institutions, that have stated that it's parents, not public schools, who should educate their children on this type of issues. What is your opinion?
La Fountain-Stokes: Gender is a social phenomenon that affects citizens' rights. As such, it is the responsibility of the state to promote knowledge and education about it. The discussion of gender is not limited to religious contexts. Separation of church and state guarantees the right to discuss important matters in a public context. Parents have the liberty to educate their children in their own views and traditions but should not ban children from learning general concepts central to politics and culture in a democratic state.
Q: How does this initiative fit with what's currently taught at U.S. schools?
La Fountain-Stokes: U.S. schools have a wide range of approaches regarding the teaching and practice of gender analysis and some are more progressive than others. Debates about these issues frequently appear in the press, regarding matters such as extracurricular clubs (Gay/Straight Alliances), discrimination against transgender children, etc.
Q: What else has affected the discussion of this issue in Puerto Rico?
La Fountain-Stokes: The rise of politicians affiliated with conservative Pentecostal and evangelical churches in Puerto Rico has seriously distorted public debates about morality and civil rights. These politicians mobilize large groups that do not necessarily correspond to majoritarian viewpoints but nevertheless receive enormous media attention. Many of the traditional parties are also dominated by very conservative Catholics, who in some cases have affiliations with organizations such as Opus Dei. In this context, it is extremely difficult to get legislation on gender and sexuality approved. In spite of this, feminist and LGBT activists and sympathetic legislators work very hard to promote progressive viewpoints and laws.
La Fountain-Stokes discusses his book "Abolición del Pato" in this video:
Contact Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes: lawrlafo@umich.edu. Bio: myumi.ch/abP5J
FACULTY Q&A
En Español
For the last few weeks, Puerto Rico's streets have seen protesters for and against the incorporation of 'perspectivas de género' or gender perspectives in the public schools' curriculum.
Proponents say the curriculum would help promote gender equity and prevent domestic violence as well as gender stereotyping in the island where last year 12,000 cases of domestic violence were reported. Retractors fear the curriculum would force children to learn about homosexuality in ways they disagree with.
Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes, director of the Latina/o Studies Program at the University of Michigan, has been following the issue closely. Born and raised in Puerto Rico, La Fountain-Stokes authored "Queer Ricans: Cultures and Sexualities in the Diaspora," a collection of essays on migration and sexuality.
La Fountain-Stokes will be one of several U-M faculty participating in the "Negotiating Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in a New Global Age" symposium March 6-7. The event, organized by U-M and the Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto de Río Piedras will take place at UPR. At least six U-M students and alumni will participate as panelists in the two-day event, the first in a series of annual conferences the universities expect to collaborate on.
La Fountain-Stokes discussed the issue with U-M's Portal en Español:
Q: What's "gender perspective" and why are legislators trying to make it part of the curriculum?
La Fountain-Stokes: "Perspectiva de género" (gender analysis) is the awareness of the social implications of gender at the individual and collective level. Specifically, how one's gender (being male or female, a man or a woman) affects a person's experiences at all levels, including in contexts of violence, inequality and discrimination. Gender analysis emphasizes multiple dimensions and variations of gender, and can include discussions of transgender experience. In Puerto Rico, gender analysis education is particularly needed given the high incidence of violence against women. Gender perspective is not sex education. It is different and it is a fallacy to confuse the two. This issue has to do with discrimination on the basis of gender, not on teaching questions of reproduction.
Q: The proposal has been rejected by conservative groups, as well as religious institutions, that have stated that it's parents, not public schools, who should educate their children on this type of issues. What is your opinion?
La Fountain-Stokes: Gender is a social phenomenon that affects citizens' rights. As such, it is the responsibility of the state to promote knowledge and education about it. The discussion of gender is not limited to religious contexts. Separation of church and state guarantees the right to discuss important matters in a public context. Parents have the liberty to educate their children in their own views and traditions but should not ban children from learning general concepts central to politics and culture in a democratic state.
Q: How does this initiative fit with what's currently taught at U.S. schools?
La Fountain-Stokes: U.S. schools have a wide range of approaches regarding the teaching and practice of gender analysis and some are more progressive than others. Debates about these issues frequently appear in the press, regarding matters such as extracurricular clubs (Gay/Straight Alliances), discrimination against transgender children, etc.
Q: What else has affected the discussion of this issue in Puerto Rico?
La Fountain-Stokes: The rise of politicians affiliated with conservative Pentecostal and evangelical churches in Puerto Rico has seriously distorted public debates about morality and civil rights. These politicians mobilize large groups that do not necessarily correspond to majoritarian viewpoints but nevertheless receive enormous media attention. Many of the traditional parties are also dominated by very conservative Catholics, who in some cases have affiliations with organizations such as Opus Dei. In this context, it is extremely difficult to get legislation on gender and sexuality approved. In spite of this, feminist and LGBT activists and sympathetic legislators work very hard to promote progressive viewpoints and laws.
La Fountain-Stokes discusses his book "Abolición del Pato" in this video:
Contact Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes: lawrlafo@umich.edu. Bio: myumi.ch/abP5J
Labels:
education,
gender,
Perspectiva de Género,
Puerto Rico,
sexuality
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)